Will this trial change my practice? ABSORB II trial (a bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus drug-eluting stent in coronary disease).

نویسندگان

  • Rodney De Palma
  • Robert A Byrne
  • Robert-Jan van Geuns
  • Thomas Pilgrim
  • Peter Jüni
  • Ibrahim Al-Rashdan
چکیده

1.The Heart Hospital, University College London Hospitals UCLH, London, United Kingdom; 2. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München and DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany; 3. Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 4. Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; 5. Institute of Primary Health Care, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 6. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kuwait and Chest Disease Hospital, University of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Economic Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Results From the ABSORB III Trial.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic impact of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared with the Xience everolimus-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND The ABSORB III trial (Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease) demonstrated that the Absorb scaffold was noninferior to the X...

متن کامل

The first generation ABSORB BVS scaffold; to be or not to be?

In the routine treatment of coronary artery disease, balloon angioplasty has been replaced by stents. The use of bare-metal stents resulted in lower rates of restenosis and repeat revascularisations. Drug-eluting stents (DES), designed with thinner struts and anti-proliferative drugs, have further enhanced the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention. Nevertheless, the new gene...

متن کامل

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial.

BACKGROUND The everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) is designed to achieve results comparable to metallic drug-eluting stents at 1 year, with improved long-term outcomes. Whether the 1-year clinical and angiographic results of BVS are noninferior to current-generation drug-eluting stents has not been established. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the angiographic ef...

متن کامل

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus metallic stent in percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the AIDA trial

Drug-eluting stents have significantly improved the long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by decreasing the excessive growth of neointima. However, conventional stents have some limitations. PCI with a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) has emerged as an alternative since the presence of the prosthesis in the coronary artery is transient. A US Food and Drug Administr...

متن کامل

Comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: study protocol of the randomized controlled EVERBIO II trial

BACKGROUND Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and third generation biolimus-eluting stents (BES) have been shown to be superior to first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and second-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). However, neointimal proliferation and very late stent thrombosis is still an unresolved issue of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation overall. The ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

دوره 11 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015